Best Sports Betting SitesTop 10 Betting SitesLINKS
us-ca

Blog — Burgess Kilpatrick | Chartered Professional Accountants in Vancouver, BC – History of Day of Unity

Looking for:

Unity day vancouver canada 2020 taxact professionalism
Click here to ENTER

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Once you have purchased a State edition, the most recent version will always be available through your personal Download Order page.

After you log in, you can download it from your list of purchased products. Security software can prevent downloads and installation, or prevent the TaxAct program from working properly after installation. You may need to temporarily disable your security software during download and installation. This will open the downloads location and allow you to choose the TaxAct installation file.

You can also use Windows search to locate the installation file on your computer. If you click on the installation file and get an error, this could be because the download is not complete. Incomplete downloads may be due to internet connection problems. Please confirm the download is complete by checking your browser for any messages showing the progress of download.

Alternatively, you can try using a different browser. Business Taxes Professional Taxes. Sign In. Prepare and File Taxes.

Return Status. Tax Tools. We’re ready to help. Have a question? Ask, or enter a search term below. Audit Assistant Get the information you need. Search Help Topics: TaxAct Software Updates. Your request has been submitted. Error while submitting form.

 
 

 

Unity day vancouver canada 2020 taxact professionalism –

 

People do their best work when they feel appreciated for who they are, not just what they do. Amid this challenging time, practicing empathy for what employees are dealing with is even more crucial.

Prioritize regular one-on-one check-ins. Send them a personal message to acknowledge how hard people are working. Take the time to enquire how things are at home. Then listen. No agenda. Emotions drive behavior, not logic. No one starts out to fail. This stifles innovation and deprives everyone of the learning required to build and retain an edge. A study at the University of Exeter Business School found that leaders who back employees to back themselves build stronger performing teams.

Removing the stigma of failure is essential to optimizing growth and adapting to change. So talk about failure, including your own, in ways that normalize it as necessary for meaningful progress.

Then celebrate the learning and talk about how you can apply it to other projects. People need to feel connected, and this is especially important in the work context. So be deliberate in fostering a sense of inclusion. Invite everyone for their input. Ask open-ended questions. Nurture discussion. Then actively listen and acknowledge the value of what everyone has to share, particularly those who may feel most marginalized. Making people feel valued for who they are, not what they do, will build the psychological safety that is a key predictor of the highest performing teams.

People rise to the level of expectation others have of them. When you treat employees as trust-worthy — by extending decision-making authority or simply letting them get on with the job — most will go the extra mile to prove you right. On the flip side, when you micromanage or undermine decisions, you do the opposite.

Of course, when trust is broken, hold people to account. Nothing demoralizes a great employee faster than watching you tolerate a poor one. Continually communicate your vision, share plans and ensure everyone knows their specific role in the larger scheme of your business and why their part matters. People are always the number one asset in your company. Unlocking their full potential requires working every day to nurture the conditions for them to engage in courageous conversations, make better decisions, and do their best work.

Small actions can make a bigger impact than grand gestures. Also, the employee cannot receive an allowance excluded from income. In , CRA began denying travel expenses claimed on the personal tax return of many employees who were also shareholders of the employer or related to a shareholder. In September of CRA released the promised guidance. It noted that the following conditions had to be met for employment expenses incurred by shareholder-employees to be deductible:.

The expenses were incurred as part of the employment duties and not as a shareholder. The worker was required to pay for the expenses personally as part of their employment duties. When the employee is also a shareholder, the written contract may not be adequate, and the implied requirements may be more difficult to demonstrate.

However, CRA noted that both of these conditions may be satisfied if the shareholder-employee can establish that the expenses are comparable to expenses incurred by employees who are not shareholders or related to a shareholder with similar duties at the company or at other businesses similar in size, industry and services provided. Instead of deducting amounts against employment income, consider whether it would be better for the company to reimburse expenses of shareholder-employees, or perhaps, pay a tax-free travel allowance.

The taxpayer and the CRA had agreed that The CRA had disallowed gardening and swimming pool maintenance costs which the taxpayer argued were business related as he met clients at his home and sometimes conducted arbitrations in the garden. He also argued that there was no personal use of the pool, but clients sometimes used it.

CRA had also disallowed costs for repair and renovation of the living room, which the taxpayer argued made that room suitable for hosting arbitrations. The Court accepted that the gardening expenses were ordinary home maintenance costs, deductible in proportion to business use of the home The pool expenses were not allowed, on the basis these were not ordinary expenses of a business of this nature, and the Court was not convinced that clients used the pool. It was not relevant that the taxpayer and his wife did not use the pool.

Claims for repairs and renovations to the living room were denied as the taxpayer had ample space in the basement office and the garden to host arbitrations and conduct his other business activities. The living room was not part of the floor space making up the agreed As well, the evidence showed the renovations were required to comply with city regulations, including removal of a wood fireplace.

Consider which portions of the home, and which expenditures clearly tie to the business use of your home. Retain and obtain documents like client emails and photos of work-spaces , which demonstrate how different portions of the home were used for business, and to what extent. Read More People tend to think of very successful and subsequently wealthy entrepreneurs and cultural leaders as extraordinary and singular human beings, and sometimes they are.

Usually, however, they are just highly attuned, exceedingly motivated thinkers who would rather try and fail for themselves than work for someone else. Yet there are some common threads that run between world-famous entrepreneurs and cultural leaders, and one of them is daily tasks.

Plan your time Successful people tend to have a set schedule. Their schedule is arranged in advance, before that day, before that week and sometimes even months before. Of course, their schedule can change, and certain variables will alter appointments, meetings and business dinners, but starting with an organized, prearranged schedule allows busy professionals to avoid wasting time throughout the day, thinking about their next move. Exercise Successful people take time to work on their fitness goals.

Whether they are working out, jogging, biking, swimming or practicing yoga, successful people understand that in order to have the energy to complete their daily tasks, they must feel good physically.

Take a look at the most successful people in the world—entrepreneurs, singers, actors and actresses, CEOs, TV and film producers—and you will very likely see that almost all of them block out time for fitness, regardless of how busy the rest of their schedules are.

Personal Development Successful entrepreneurs understand that in order to maintain the level of success they have already achieved, they must continue to learn, grow and improve their craft. They often add personal development into their schedule, knowing there will always be someone who can provide them with guidance, advice and new knowledge, so these inquisitive people make time to learn something new every day. Personal development is easier than ever now; all you need is an internet connection and a laptop or a tablet or cell phone.

You can watch industry leaders and all types of icons discuss just about any topic on TED, and you can find inspiration in your own community by listening to local leaders on TEDx. If you have varied interests and would like to learn about something related to your business, you can easily utilize Coursera, which offers courses on a multitude of subjects from universities. If you prefer to expand your horizons the old-fashioned way, simply pick up a book whenever you have spare time.

You can even listen to audio books while you commute. Many successful entrepreneurs admit to reading over 60 books per year.

How many books did you read last year? Eat Breakfast This is another simple but overlooked task. We all know breakfast is the most important meal of the day, but not all of us live by this rule.

Successful people, however, seem to take the adage more seriously. Despite schedules filled with numerous responsibilities, a variety of locations and business decisions that may seem much more important than eating breakfast, highly successful people still eat breakfast. They acknowledge that they simply do not perform as well when they are hungry what type of performing they do is irrelevant ; they are not as aggressive, not as creative, not as focused and not as motivated.

For most entrepreneurs and cultural leaders, this small step is an easy way to gain a competitive edge. Reflect Revisit successes and failures throughout the day, and consider whether or not you reached a goal, missed a deadline or grew your business. Successful entrepreneurs and cultural leaders take time to acknowledge their daily accomplishments, and also explore the ones on which they fell short.

They ponder what happened, and what can be done differently in the future. A lot of successful entrepreneurs and cultural leaders contemplate their goals at least twice a day.

These are just five daily tasks that all of us can implement in order to emulate some of the most successful entrepreneurs and cultural leaders in the world. Please feel free to add suggestions for other daily tasks in the Comments section below..

If you have any questions or want to speak further about your corporation or tax planning matters, contact Nicholas Kilpatrick at nkilpatrick burgesskilpatrick. This articel was written by Devin Scott, Delaware Inc. As many businesses are struggling with cashflow, it may be attractive to direct these amounts held in trust for the government to satisfy other creditors, such as suppliers. Director liability can extend beyond directors of a corporation to other directors, such as those of a non-profit organization.

The following recent court cases highlight some of the issues related to this liability exposure:. Their significant contributions of personal assets to pay other creditors and efforts to remedy the failure after it has occurred could not offset the lack of steps taken to prevent the failure to remit.

Care should also be provided to properly resign as a director to limit future exposure. CRA must issue the assessment against the directors within two years from the time they last ceased to be directors. Ensure all source deductions are made in a timely manner. Failing to make source deductions may expose directors personally to the liability. The Tax Court Of Canada decided on a case involving a number of expenses claimed by taxpayers a corporation and its sole individual shareholder in respect of the business of selling financial products and providing financial planning advice.

CRA denied various expenses spanning multiple years and assessed many of them as shareholder benefits. That is, the amounts were taxable to the individual shareholder and not deductible to the corporation.

CRA also assessed beyond the normal reassessment period on the basis that the taxpayers made a misrepresentation attributable to neglect, carelessness, wilful default or fraud. The taxpayer argued that any benefits taxable to him personally were conferred by virtue of his employment, not his shareholdings, and, therefore, should be deductible to the corporation. The Court also found the vast majority of denied expenses to be a shareholder benefit.

The taxpayer, through his unfettered control, chose not to pay salaries or bonuses but rather to deduct the disallowed expenses from the corporate receipts and never report or ascribe any amount of benefit or employment income to himself. The Court stated that the gross negligence penalties exist for these such situations: sophisticated taxpayers must appreciate that using corporate structures to mask inappropriate deductions and shield personal income from tax should not be done.

It would have been much cheaper had the taxpayer taken additional salaries or dividends, and paid the additional taxes up front, rather than running personal expenses through the corporation. In the case where personal expenses are paid by the corporation, the accounts should generally be corrected by adjusting the shareholder loan account or having the individual pay the corporation back.

This was not done in this case. As best as possible, keep business and personal expenses separate. Deducting personal expenses in a corporation can lead to a very costly bill, well in excess of the tax should the amounts have been reported correctly. For example, a convenience store might form an alliance with a fuel company to create a one-stop gas station. Together, these companies can pull in a larger number of customers and benefit from complementary sales activities.

Despite the many potential benefits, strategic alliance partnerships can fail without careful consideration by all parties. Look for peers and who are like-minded and share your ethics. Viable sources include networking events, online groups or social networking, industry and trade publications, trade associations, and government agencies. Make sure the alliance is a win-win situation. For example, if you plan on tackling the global market, your potential partner may be international, but may lack the product knowledge you have.

Identify the kind of alliance you want — marketing, licensing, distribution, technology, or research and development. Calculate the amount of time you can both realistically commit to the project. You should also determine how much you can afford to invest and lose, should your alliance fail. Many business relationships fail because of faulty assumptions and poor communication. To avoid failure, take notes, have minutes of meetings recorded, and document all agreements and actions to be taken.

Be cautious about taking things to the next level before testing the waters. If your partner misses the first deadline, how will they meet future ones? Decide upfront before anything goes wrong on an exit strategy that suits you both if the alliance fails. A lot of work and a little bit of play go a long way in a maintaining a healthy and successful strategic partnership. The possibilities for business owners to create strategic alliances are endless.

By sharing resources, costs, and risks, your strategic alliance may catapult your growth in a way you would never achieve on your own.

The quest to turn your idea into money, a career, or a successful exit can result in some important foundational tasks left unattended. You may not get to where you want to go without them. Although the product is ready to go, doing the marketing and penetrating your target market takes lots of more money, backing, support, and still more discipline. In an effort to spare you the utter devastation of multiple VC funding denials, get ready before you go in front of them by having thought through your optimal revenue and compensation models.

Forget pie-in-the-sky numbers and instead show sustained, justifiable revenue increases year-over-year facilitated by a pre-requisite sustained effort to grow your traction base increased, sustained traction resulting in an increasing revenue base.

Remember that the numbers, the strategy and the execution will all be a reflection of the ability of the management team to bring the venture to financial fruition. A great management team combined with a revenue plan containing leaks and irrationalities will possibly capsize a VC funding. Put a solid, confident pitch out there. The key is to sell yourself — as confident and able to disrupt the market you want to penetrate.

Also make sure that the activity for the next 6 months is reasonable for where the venture is at the moment. If you get it right, it shows reasonability, a well thought-out plan, and adds to the confidence picture you want to portray. These parameters get blurred with the globe one URL away, but the message is to penetrate a manageable space, secure that space, and then scale. Relaying this to the VC will again show a reasonable plan for penetration and growth.

So you emphasize, for example, hitting the west coast market, then once your metrics show viability and sustainability, you venture our nationally, etc…. Showing the VC a structured and manageable plan lowers the probability of failure and attests to the ability of the management team to do things right.

These are just a few highlights of what I think you should have ready when you go before a VC to get funded at this level. Above all, your ability to show confidence and exude ability and trust will go a long way to get their money and business support, which may be the key to your own success. If you operate a business, we welcome your insights at www. Facebook: www. He specializes in business development, and has worked with business owners to increase profitability at all stages of their businesses.

He can be reached at nkilpatrick burgesskilpatrick. Some of you may have already received this questionnaire. The intention of this is to disclose information that that CRA may use to warrant from their perspective an audit of your real estate transactions.

The project is aimed at promoters, developers, and taxpayers involved in multiple real estate transactions. The CRA believes that a substantial amount of taxpayers are transacting real estate deals that constitute an income transaction rather than a capital one, and wants to collect the additional taxes previously unpaid. To assist taxpayers, a Real estate questionnaire that the department will use to determine qualified audit candidates has been released for public use and can be referenced below.

The questionnaire is designed to get information for taxing purposes only, and there is the risk that the CRA may use this information to assert a tax position on your transactions inconsistent with a fair and equitable application of the Income Tax Act. If you have such a questionnaire and need help is answering the questions that assert your position, give me a call.

At Burgess Kilpatrick, we will guide you with the CRA in audit questionnaire issues and will save you from hefty tax payment. If you have any questions or want to speak further about your joint venture, real estate or tax issues, contact Nicholas Kilpatrick at nkilpatrick burgesskilpatrick.

In the midst of the competitive business environment they find themselves in, professional dental operators by and large recognize the need to manage their practices not only in the present ie: to attract revenues today , but also to lay the foundation for additional, referral revenue for the future.

As the apt saying states, each service is an advertisement for the next. Such advertising is not defined as exclusively pushing additional treatments on the patient — you as the dentist will recognize the time and place for that to happen. Rather, quality face-to-face advertising with a high return for your practice is in the form of a more personal engagement. Engagement is the medium of marketing in our economy. Digital marketers and advertisers daily assert with loud vocal trumpets the need to engage online, and this constitutes a necessary cog in the marketing arsenal of any business, especially dentists.

Personal engagement is the time to build trust. Online mediums have afforded us all the opportunity to commence, develop, and track engagement online until that key time when engagement turns from digital to personal, thereby denoting a spike in the trust relationship and a signal of a new patient.

How can the practitioner turn the complaint visit to the dentist into an engaging experience? Our research suggests that doing exactly this will increase client services, as well as referrals. Turning visits to engagements is, in our opinion, the key to complementing practice growth and proper management of that growth. About 5 years ago, some restaurants began offering to waiting patrons small samples of their menu offerings at no charge, a decision considered by many to be wise not only because it gave patrons the desire to order the full size of the menu items tasted, but also because the offering differentiated those restaurants from their competitors and established rapport with visiting customers.

Dentists would be well-served to employ the same strategy — provide an environment and offerings that differentiate you from competitors and that prepare the patient for, among other things, cross-selling opportunities. Many visiting the practice are either working men and women, or are bringing their children to the dentist. They need a place to engage with their work, since time in this economy is valuable.

We know that coffee is not the best thing to have prior to a dental check-up, so provide them with a toothbrush and toothpaste to clean up afterwards. The key is to provide something that you know they want, so that you can build rapport and trust. There are dental practices that are, similar to bank branches, installing tables with Ipads. This is unacceptable. It is especially unacceptable because Quebec is getting shafted even more than the NDP on this issue.

To qualify for this Canada child benefit top-up, the child’s dental care must not be fully covered through private or public insurance. However, since , Quebec has had an extremely progressive policy for children under It covers most of the services that families need. This program could be enhanced, which would be possible if Ottawa would provide health transfers. This program means that Quebeckers who go to the dentist for routine care do not have to pay a cent. They are not eligible for this federal money.

What should Quebeckers do, ask for strawberry-flavoured fluoride or an extra filling? Should we ask for additional services and try to spend more at the dentist, just so we can get a benefit that could have been enhanced, by consensus in the House, at the touch of a button? This is all because of the little deal reached between the Liberals and the NDP. The day they made the announcement, there just happened to be a press conference in Quebec where people in the field, people who had spent more than just a couple of weeks thinking and talking about the issue, people who are very familiar with the issue, asked the Government of Quebec to increase public coverage in Quebec and urge Ottawa to boost health transfers.

I want to read from a document that I have here. The response is so clear that I could not have said it better myself. They said that it is nonsense. That is what people in the know are saying. For years, they have been asking for services, for real coverage. They are asking to be able to go to the dentist under an existing program and have the services already covered.

We have gotten to this point because the federal government broke its promise to negotiate health transfers with the provinces. Since the start of the pandemic, the Prime Minister has been telling us that there is a pandemic going on, that now is not the time, that it is too soon.

The government said that once the pandemic was over, it would negotiate increased health transfers with the provinces, as Quebec and the provinces are calling for.

Everyone agrees on increasing health transfers, except the federal government. When it comes to health transfers, the government has no money, but when it comes to things the NDP wants, there is always money available. The pandemic is over. The temporary EI measures are set to be lifted on Sunday. Enough with this nonsense. People need real care.

Children need real dental care. The provinces are the experts here, and that is how it should be. The government must keep its word. I want to conclude by saying that we will vote in favour of the bill because we support the principle. I think it needs some work in committee.

With a few fillings, some fluoride, a good brushing, a rinse and a few amendments, this bill might just pass the smell test. Why, in any fashion, would the Bloc prevent a federal initiative that would provide badly needed dental care to children of all regions of our country?

I understand that the member comes from a province that does not have a progressive provincial dental insurance program like Quebec does. I understand that it is not part of his culture to know that Quebec already has this type of program.

The government is not helping families by duplicating the program, by complicating it and by creating obstacles for families who want an increase in family benefits. Rather than giving them money, the government is telling them to go to the CRA to have their claims verified.

How is that good news for families? I would like someone to explain that to me. I am more hopeful and optimistic than he is because, last year, in Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, when I met up with people in parks or went door-knocking, people really seemed to care about dental coverage whenever we talked about it.

Not everyone has supplementary insurance or coverage through some kind of public plan, so people really want this. After the Liberals voted twice against NDP proposals to make dental care available to the poor and the middle class, we used our leverage in the House to force the Liberals to do just that, for the benefit of families, workers and anyone who cannot afford dental care.

By the end of the year, dental care will be covered for kids aged 12 and under, and by next year, it will be covered for teenagers and seniors. This is good news for poor and middle-class Quebeckers, and it is all thanks to the work being done by the NDP. It seems that the member spends a lot of time in parks like Molson park.

I hope he will take the opportunity to tell people that to get better benefits for children they will have to waste a lot of time with CRA and maybe even suffer through an audit if the dentist cancels their day.

I wish him luck at the parks. My speech today should be of interest to my constituents because it is about things that affect their daily lives, things they work hard for, in other words, rent, dental insurance, quality of life and so on. I will talk about two things: the dental benefit and the rent support program. This spring, when we were getting ready to vote on the budget implementation bill, some members in the House stated loud and clear that they were voting in favour of the bill in order to keep one of their promises, which was one of the reasons they reached an agreement with the Liberal Party, namely the implementation of dental insurance.

However, the current bill does not actually establish dental insurance. A benefit and insurance are two completely different concepts. Insurance pays for all or part of the dental care a person receives in a year. A benefit is an amount of money given at some point during the year.

Too bad if it does not cover all the costs, but it is nice if it does. I have four children. Quebec covers some dental care, but not basic care like annual scaling and cleaning, or sealing pits and fissures in adult teeth to prevent cavities.

Two of them required appointments every six months. I am fastidious about dental hygiene. There are years when we had to cut our budget to make sure our children saw a dentist. There are years when they did not see one at all because we could not afford it.

In addition to not adequately covering people’s needs, getting the benefit is going to be a pain, because parents have to claim it through CRA’s My Account portal. As my colleague said, that means parents need access to a computer and the Internet, which not everyone has. When people have to cut spending, the Internet is often one of the things they let go of.

Parents also have to trust a system that has either lost data or been hacked in recent years. Sounds great, right? Why not set up a simpler process, such as using health cards? True, health cards are within the purview of Quebec and the Canadian provinces, not the federal government. Need I remind the House that dental care is health care and is therefore under the jurisdiction of the governments of Quebec and the Canadian provinces?

Quebec has dental insurance, as I said earlier. It used to be much more comprehensive, but is only partial now. When federal health transfers were pared down in the s, Quebec and the Canadian provinces had to make tough choices.

One of those choices was to reduce the age of eligibility for free dental care from 18 to My father did not have to pay for my dental care because it was covered. The federal government is once again infringing on an area of Quebec or provincial jurisdiction rather than fulfilling its constitutional duty with regard to health transfers.

It is rather ridiculous that the separatist party in the House is the one reminding the federal government of its constitutional duties. The government wants to look like the great saviour when it is actually the one that has been causing these problems since the s. Basically, the government is pulling a Perry, the firefighter who set fire to the Montreal Parliament building in He knew how to set fires and put them out.

By cutting health transfers, the federal government knew full well that the burden would fall on the shoulders of Quebec and the provinces rather than on its own. It knew that Quebec and the provinces would be forced to cut public services and programs. It knew that those cuts would tarnish the reputation of Quebec and the provinces. It knew that, as a result, over time, any separatist movement in Quebec or the other provinces would be undermined.

However, the bad news is that the opposite is happening. What is good news for Quebec and the provinces may not be good news for the federal government. The federal government is the main reason for the cuts in Quebec and the provinces, the same federal government that, today, is setting itself up as the great saviour of services and keeps repeating that it is not an ATM.

I would like to remind the federal government that the money in that so-called ATM belongs to citizens. That money did not grow on trees. The federal government needs to abide by the constitutional agreements and increase transfers to the amount called for by Quebec and the provinces.

Some are sure to argue that the current bill introduces an interim measure for two years while a real insurance program is being created. What will happen in two years? There will probably be an election. The interim measure might end up being in place longer than expected, to the point of being seen as permanent. It is kind of the same thing with employment insurance, which has its share of problems. We are told the situation is temporary and that improvements will be made.

That was supposed to happen this summer. The reform will be put off indefinitely even though the government says it is urgent. We have heard that before. In the parliamentary process, suggestions can be made in the form of amendments introduced in committee. The first suggestion would definitely be to respect constitutional agreements regarding health transfers. The second may be to give Quebec and those provinces that may choose to do so the option of opting out with compensation.

Doing so would be in line with the Constitution in that it would keep the federal government out of jurisdictions that are not its own. I now want to briefly talk about my daughter’s experience as a renter.

The apartment is two rooms, in a dark, unheated semi-basement. That does not include food. She is fortunate that mom and dad can help her, but that is not the case for everyone. The figure of 0. That is more expensive than a mortgage and it makes no sense. Sending this cheque is not unlike patching a crumbling wall with a glue stick. The wall needs to be fixed. In other words, we need programs that are sustainable and predictable.

Starting in , , units per year were supposed to be built in order to meet the growing demographic need. Things are not getting any better. I would hope that no one here has had to cut up towels to make diapers, like I did. I hope that no one here has had to stock their cupboard with beans, instant rice, peanut butter and bread to feed their family, like I did. I hope no one has had to roll their pennies to buy milk. That is where unaffordable rent gets us.

Today’s bill is all about providing dental care and making it affordable for children under the age of Is this member, and the member who spoke before her, trying to say that it does not complement the system in the province of Quebec?

Not all provinces are equal. Is she saying that not one of her constituents would benefit by this program? If she is, she is wrong. Julie Vignola :. I did not say that no one would benefit from this. I said that these services fall under the jurisdiction of Quebec and the Canadian provinces. If a Canadian province, such as his, wants to have access to dental insurance, real dental insurance, not a temporary cheque, then so be it.

However, the other provinces, the ones that want to manage this jurisdiction of service delivery on their own, should have the right to opt out with compensation. I am quite proud of what we have been able to accomplish by forcing the Liberals to bring in measures that will really help people. Yes, the money for dental care this year is a temporary measure.

It is not real insurance yet. We are working on adding teens, seniors and people with disabilities next year. For all these reasons, I think today’s bill is good news for the people of Quebec. Perhaps some will say that I live in a fantasy world, but, in my mind, the government’s goal and our objective in this Parliament should be to protect the dignity of the most vulnerable in our society, and not just to win the next election, but really for the long term.

This program is nothing more than paltry cheques that amount to temporary band-aids on the gaping wounds that are the insufficient health transfers and the deeply flawed building programs that have been in place since , at least.

There is currently a shortage of , homes. If we had had an adequate supply of housing, prices would not have skyrocketed the way they did. I do not know if the Liberals found it painful to have to create this program, perhaps like having a tooth extracted.

This is not dental insurance. The Liberals are sending a cheque for dental care in order to save face with Quebec and Canadian families. This is not a dental care program. What we need to do is work on bringing in real insurance with the right to opt out with compensation for Quebec and the Canadian provinces that wish to administer that insurance themselves.

That means that people are struggling to pay for everything, to buy their groceries, to put food on the table and gas in their cars, but what I heard from people that really struck me was their feeling that, no matter how hard they work, no matter how much they are doing everything that, in their minds, they need to do and doing everything right, they are still falling behind. That is a very difficult thing to feel. It makes one feel very hopeless and frustrated, and understandably so. When people are doing everything right, they should be able to have the respect and dignity to put food on the table, pay their bills and take care of their families.

Clearly people are struggling. When I talk to Canadians across the country, they tell me their story. They tell me that they work very hard, but even so, it is becoming harder and harder for them to make ends meet.

They cannot afford to buy the same food they used to, and they cannot get what they need. That is the reality. They fear for the future, and they are frustrated. I understand that because that is the reality. I also understand what that is like because I have lived it. I remember the difficult times my brother and I had. When I was going to university, I had a kid brother that I had to take care of, and I had to work a bunch of jobs to make sure that I was able to put food on the table, not only for myself, but also for my younger brother.

The worry and fear of not being able to take care of a loved one really weighs on a person. It is a lot of pressure, and a lot of families are experiencing that right now. At the same time, while workers’ wages are not keeping up with inflation, CEOs’ salaries are skyrocketing.

CEOs are not having any struggles. Their wages and salaries are going up while those of workers’ are lagging behind. It is clear that is wrong and it should not be this way. In fact, it does not have to be this way. There is a war being waged right now on workers and working families across this country. We are witnessing a massive transfer of wealth from hard-working, honest Canadians to the pockets of billionaires, and behind every billionaire is a Liberal or Conservative government that allowed the exploitation and disrespect of workers, the brutality of corporate greed and tax loopholes that stole wealth from Canadians.

Billions of dollars of taxpayer money in corporate welfare went directly to CEOs and wealthy corporations. Behind every working family in this country are New Democrats fighting for and demanding respect and dignity, forcing CEOs to pay what they owe and making sure that government has Canadians’ backs, because it is hard-working Canadians, the workers and not the greedy CEOs, who make our country an incredible place.

That is why, for the past number of months, we have been pushing hard on the government to respond the needs of people. Last spring, we said that we should double the GST tax credit to put more of Canadians’ own money back into their pockets to deal with everything becoming more expensive. The Liberals said no. The Prime Minister and the Liberal government were too busy saying it was not their fault and that it is worse in other countries to act to find solutions to support people in this time.

That is the problem with the Liberals. When people need help, they study, they consult, they find excuses not to take action. In the meantime, people are suffering. When it is wealthy CEOs making demands, the Liberals spring into action. That is the problem. We have seen this again and again. These measures could have made a massive difference in people’s lives if they had been passed earlier. People would have been able to have this respect and dignity over the summer. It could have helped families get ready for their kids going back to school.

That is the issue with the Liberals. They are too busy pointing fingers elsewhere and saying it is not their fault and that it is worse in other countries. That might be true, but it does not help the family who is looking at its bills right now and asking what it will do to pay them.

It is frustrating we need to force the government to act every time people need support. Then there are the Conservatives, who think everyone should just be on their own. They want to inflame the anger and frustration Canadians rightly feel, but they do not want to provide any solutions that would actually make people’s lives better right now.

A family that is struggling to pay its bills wants some respect and dignity now. A family that cannot afford for its kids to go to the dentist needs that support immediately. That is what we are doing. The Conservatives’ approach has always been to let people fend for themselves. If people are having a hard time paying for day care or medication or if they have lost their job and need help, the Conservatives tell them to figure it out.

Canadians have seen the results of this approach. The ultrarich reap the benefits. Ordinary people suffer and are ignored. I want to be clear about what we are facing right now in this country. We are facing a cost-of-living increase and rising inflation that is being driven by corporate greed. No one else wants to talk about that. No one else wants to point to the fact that, while workers’ wages have not kept up, CEO salaries have skyrocketed and wealthy corporations have seen massive profits.

They have taken this moment in time, this crisis, as an opportunity to jack up their prices beyond increased costs, which is why they are experiencing these massive profits, and people are hurting. Inflation is not the workers’ fault, as many folks want to suggest. It wants less oil and more renewable energies. In Quebec, we believe in the potential of renewable energies.

That is how we will be able to protect ourselves from future oil price shocks. Quebec will consume less and less oil, and that is the direction we need to take for the sake of the planet and our future economy. In his speech, the Leader of the Opposition accused a member of the House from Quebec of wanting to tax Quebeckers through carbon pricing. He does not seem to realize that, since , Quebec has had its own carbon pricing and that, as a result, the federal carbon pricing does not apply to the province.

Does my colleague not find it strange that the Leader of the Opposition, who wants to get votes in Quebec, is so disconnected from what is happening in the province? In politics, as members know, we try to reach people to listen to their problems and to offer them solutions.

We then come to the House to represent them and speak on their behalf. When a party leader comes here but does not even know the reality of the Quebec nation and is incapable of understanding it, how can he possibly represent Quebec in the House of Commons? It is impossible. I know that the number of Conservative MPs is now nine and is trending downward. I would therefore suggest that the Conservative MPs from Quebec reason with their leader and have him stop talking nonsense about Quebec.

We have two pieces of legislation: Bill C and Bill C Both of those measures fall under what the member is advocating for, with a targeted approach to helping those most in need through the GST rebate and the dental insurance program. Canadians would benefit by them, but it would appear the Conservatives would like to continue to debate the legislation. Can the member offer any thoughts in regard to how we can assist Canadians by ensuring that this legislation passes in a timely fashion?

It is a Liberal tradition, one they learned from the NDP. The NDP are Liberals in a hurry. What they want is to have every possible reason to interfere in the jurisdictions of Quebec and the provinces. They told themselves they were going to help households. Some, wanting to go even further, thought they would help households while sticking their their noses in the business of Quebec and the provinces.

They thought it would be really cool, because they believe they are smarter than everyone else and know what Quebeckers need better than the Quebec government does. They figured they would show up with their nice cheques adorned with a maple leaf and just bypass Quebec’s authority.

That, however, is not a good idea. I was shocked earlier to hear the Leader of the Opposition say that he did not know that Quebec had its own carbon exchange. A party leader who wants to become prime minister does not know that Quebec has its own carbon exchange? Does my colleague think the rest of the opposition leader’s speech makes sense if he really did not know that? It is important to understand that the leader of the Conservative Party is not crazy, not at all, so we have to ask why he did not know that.

The answer is that he does not care. He is switched on to what western Canada wants. He listens to what his cronies in Alberta and Saskatchewan want and caters to their needs. Then he says he wants to be the prime minister for all Canadians and expects us believe that. What he really wants is to defend the views of western Canada and then try to sell those views to everyone else, including Quebec.

He is an economist, and he explained clearly that a better knowledge of the technical details is necessary before proposing measures that could have major repercussions on the public. Of course, we all agree that inflation is very real and that it affects everyone, all the people in all the ridings we represent, and we want to propose solutions. However, before rushing to introduce concrete measures, we need to know whether or not it is the right thing to do.

Today feels like Groundhog Day. Back in June, the Conservative Party moved a similar motion with almost identical wording. That motion talked about the rising cost of living and proposed, once again, to abolish the carbon tax in order to put money back into the pockets of Quebeckers and Canadians. However, I find it a bit odd to hear the Conservative members from Quebec say that this measure will put money back into Quebeckers’ pockets when the carbon tax does not even apply in Quebec.

As my colleague clearly explained earlier, the carbon market is working very well in Quebec. Unfortunately, the goal of this Conservative measure may not actually be what they say it is. They are proposing a solution to inflation, which is a very real problem. However, instead of helping families, this measure would help the oil companies, which are not currently doing their part.

Families are doing their part and getting money in return. It is a system that works quite well, and that is what the Parliamentary Budget Officer has said. The Conservatives have a gift for twisting people’s words. Just yesterday, during the debate on hurricane Fiona, I made a connection between extreme weather events and climate change.

That is not it at all. We want to cut fossil fuels out entirely and invest in renewable energy. They did the same thing with the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s report. The Conservatives hand-picked one section and put their own spin on it.

What the Parliamentary Budget Officer actually said was that the general consensus among economists is that explicit carbon pricing is the most cost-effective approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. I think we can trust the Parliamentary Budget Officer on that. It works very well in Quebec, anyway.

I will not repeat all the causes of inflation, since my House leader did an excellent job of that earlier. However, I would like to emphasize the repercussions that inflation is having on people in my region, eastern Quebec.

That is not a lot of money for a whole year. With the rising cost of living, the cost of groceries, the cost of gas and the price of housing, people are already struggling to make ends meet on a daily basis, and have been for many years. They have to count their pennies and stick to their budgets. Now they are really stretched to the limit.

I visited a few farms this summer. With skyrocketing input costs and shortages of parts needed for farm equipment, our farmers’ job is getting harder and harder. We are talking about the people who help put food on our tables three times a day. Inflation is having an impact on these people and on the people they feed. These people were telling us that they have to choose between paying the rent and buying groceries. They have to choose between food and shelter, both of which are basic needs.

We are at a point where people are having to choose between these two basic needs. It is frightening to see what an impact inflation is having on the people in my riding. Obviously the spike in construction costs has turned off the developers.

There are not a lot of people who want to invest, and that is leading to a housing shortage in the region. The housing investments that the federal government is making are good, but sadly insufficient. Often these big amounts go to large cities, and the regions are overlooked. Lawrence for the first time in 20 years, and we would love to welcome more people, but we have nowhere for them to live.

The same goes for the labour shortage. We are eager to bring in workers from other parts of Quebec or Canada and from around the world, but there is nowhere to put them.

That is having a direct impact on the people in my region. That is not insignificant. Every holiday season, I like to go and help distribute Christmas baskets to those most in need. We are seeing just how much those numbers are going up. Also, fewer people are available to help out or to donate goods or money because they are dealing with the rising cost of living.

It is a vicious cycle and we are having trouble helping each other out. I believe that we all agree with the first part of the Conservatives’ motion. Inflation is very real and we must find solutions.

However, I do not believe that scrapping the carbon tax is the magic solution. As I mentioned, this is the second time they have tried to pass this in the House, but a majority of members rejected it because we know there are other solutions on the table.

Of course we have to have these debates and use all means necessary to implement measures quickly. My colleague spoke about solutions that could be implemented.

Once you dig deeper into the facts and into the technical details, it becomes clear that this claim is incomplete and lacking specifics. As I said earlier, the tax does not apply in Quebec. It applies in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario. The government committed to giving the proceeds of the gas tax directly back to individuals and families through climate action incentive payments. The PBO did his analysis in March That will not happen until , which is when some families might feel the pain.

We know oil companies are not contributing their fair share. They should be paying more. Eliminating the carbon tax will not help us fight climate change and meet our greenhouse gas reduction targets. Yes, there is room for improvement. Nothing is ever perfect, but for the time being, that is not the solution that will put money back in people’s pockets, certainly not for the low-income families that get that tax refunded.

What we need to do is focus on the subsidies being given to oil companies, the money being taken from the wallets of Canadians and Quebeckers and given to oil and gas companies. I am running out of time, but we will have plenty of time to talk about this later. Kristina Michaud :.

I may have said a few positive things about what the government is doing, however, much more needs to be done on the environment. The government says it is green. It says it is a champion of the fight against climate change, but that is actually not true. The reality is that we can never reach our greenhouse gas reduction targets. We continue to finance the biggest polluters. The government is implementing a polluter pay system, but we are helping polluters continue to pollute.

More needs to be done and the Liberal government needs to do better at this time. This is a tax on people, people who are suffering. The member said people are afraid of starving to death. We have not heard many speeches from our Conservative friends proposing effective environmental measures. I do not think I have heard any at all, actually.

We are hearing more and more about new technologies. Perhaps that is what the hon. For example, carbon capture technology costs millions of dollars, and we do not yet know if it really works.

By the time this technology is actually used by most major polluters, our greenhouse gas reduction target dates will have come and gone. In conclusion, I think we could be doing more on the environment, but what the Conservative Party is proposing here today is certainly not the solution.

When workers are hurting, big oil and gas companies are making profit. I hear the Conservatives clapping at that. On the backs of workers, big CEOs are making record profits. We hear them clap.

Does the hon. Let us invest it in wind energy and hydroelectricity as Quebec has done for years. People are struggling with the cost of living. They are struggling with rising inflation.

They are struggling to pay for gas, groceries and housing. They are worried about their future and are worried about the future of the planet. They are doing everything right, yet they are struggling to afford basic necessities while billionaires and big corporations are getting richer than ever.

The cost-of-living crisis and rising inflation are being driven by corporate greed. Corporate profits are rising twice as fast as inflation, and as said a number of times today, wages are rising only half as fast. Neither the Conservatives nor the Liberals want to acknowledge the fact that big corporations are benefiting from this crisis and that big corporations are using this crisis as an opportunity to raise prices beyond their increased costs. They are making massive profits while families are hurting.

The Conservatives want to inflame the anger and frustration. They applaud when we talk about Canadians struggling and massive corporations making record profits. Canadians are rightly frustrated and angry, but the Conservatives fail to provide solutions that would actually make a difference in people’s lives. They do not want to address the fact that big oil companies are making record profits off the backs of Canadians.

When the New Democrats called for a tax on the excess profits of huge corporations to help make life more affordable, both the Conservatives and the Liberals voted no. The New Democrats believe we need solutions to deal with the cost-of-living crisis that actually support families and workers. Cutting the price on pollution will not help Canadian families struggling with the cost of living.

In fact, the vast majority of Canadians get more money back in rebates than they pay at the pumps. Those with the lowest incomes get the most back, so no, cutting the price on carbon will not help working people. It will only help big oil pad its bottom line and delay climate action. With the increasing intensity of extreme weather, climate fires and floods, Canadians know we cannot afford to back down in our fight against the climate crisis. Report after report shows that having mitigation and adaptation now is far less expensive than paying for rebuilding infrastructure that has been destroyed or dealing with the aftermath of climate fires, flooding and hurricanes.

More than that, it also saves people’s lives. The Leader of the Opposition and the Conservatives may not believe in fighting the climate crisis, but Canadians know better and expect their government to take action.

While the New Democrats support a price on pollution, it is not a silver bullet. The Liberals have not been taking the action that matches the urgency or scale of the crisis we are facing, and they continue to let big polluters off the hook. Carbon pricing must be fairer. The New Democrats would roll back loopholes the Liberals have given to the biggest polluters and make them pay their fair share. Both the Conservatives and the Liberals need to stop standing up for corporate interests and start standing up for working people.

We are calling for a tax on the excess profits of big oil to help make life more affordable while fighting the climate crisis. Big oil is benefiting while working families are hurting. It is hard to even imagine what that number means.

Amazingly, at the very same time, oil and gas CEOs are lining their pockets and delaying climate action. They have the audacity to tell the government they need more time and more subsidies to meet the Liberals’ already weak climate targets.

At a time when oil and gas companies are making more money than ever, it is unacceptable that they are not paying to clean up their own mess and are instead begging for more corporate handouts. However, it is not surprising, because the Liberals have been giving billions of dollars each year to these big oil and gas companies.

This is nothing more than corporate greed. The New Democrats have asked and will continue to push the Liberals to do something to take on this corporate greed, but both the Liberals and the Conservatives have said no. They said no to making CEOs pay what they owe.

They said no to making sure the wealthiest corporations pay their fair share. They are fine with the ultrarich getting richer and richer while workers continue to struggle to make ends meet.

Solutions to deal with the rising cost of living should not put further burden on the shoulders of families. Big corporations and wealthy CEOs should not be getting away without paying their fair share. The New Democrats support putting a price on pollution, but the Liberals’ carbon pricing system continues to let big polluters off the hook. Under their flawed system, Canada’s biggest polluters pay the lowest carbon tax rate. Suncor only pays one-fourteenth of the full carbon price.

These loopholes need to be closed so that big oil pays what it owes for its pollution. While a price on pollution is important, it is not nearly enough. The Liberals have continued to fail when it comes to meeting the urgency of this crisis.

Instead of expecting the carbon tax to be a silver bullet, the Liberals need to make bold investments in clean energy, in energy-efficiency homes and buildings and in public transit. The Liberals need a real plan that supports workers and creates jobs in communities across Canada. They need to stop giving billions in subsidies to oil and gas companies, the same companies that are profiting off the backs of Canadians.

We need solutions to deal with the cost of living that actually support families, that help workers, that make life more affordable and that do not put further burden on the shoulders of families. The Conservatives believe people should be left to fend for themselves while billionaires reap the benefits. Then there are the Liberals, who are so far out of touch with the reality of working families that they need to be forced to act.

When it comes to climate change, they like to say all the right things but then fail to do the right things. We know the support that Canadians are getting right now is not enough. Families are still hurting while oil and gas companies are getting richer and richer. We will continue to call on the Liberals to put in place an excess profits tax on oil and gas companies to provide relief for struggling Canadians.

The EU has announced plans for a tax on windfall profits. It is shameful that the Liberals have so far refused to make big polluters pay their fair share. Last week, the Minister of Environment appeared to change his tune, saying he is not against a windfall tax but that he is waiting on oil and gas companies to show their commitment to climate action.

It is clear this is a fantasy being sold by the environment minister and the oil and gas lobby. A new report from The Pembina Institute shows that oil and gas companies are paying out huge dividends to their shareholders instead of investing in climate solutions.

While the Liberals and the Conservatives are more interested in helping corporations maximize their profits, the New Democrats will continue to fight for Canadians, workers and communities.

We need climate action and we need it now. Who could be against that? However, this measure is an attempt to make up for the lack of federal investments in housing over the past 30 years. If the federal government had been investing in housing over the past 30 years, there would be more housing units on the market and housing prices would not be this high. The government now wants to spend all kinds of money on this measure to make up for the lack of investment over 30 years.

Would it not have been better to invest that money in concrete and build homes to increase supply and make housing less expensive in the coming years?

Laurel Collins :. I would say that, absolutely, it is not enough. Five hundred dollars to support 1. However, we also need to be investing in social housing, non-profit housing and co-operative housing. It has been decades, and it was the Liberal government that cut the housing investments. Just seeing how much she has achieved over the past years since I first met her years ago really made me feel thankful for the opportunity that many of us get to work with outstanding young individuals like Tamara.

I just want to really give her all the best wishes from my Burnaby caucus and colleagues for her great work and also, of course, from the member for New Westminster.

Liberal caucus for a number of years now. Leah Caldow is actually in the gallery. She started out as a constituency assistant of mine up in Kamloops, did her best to keep me out of trouble on most days up there, and then for the last year and a half, she has been supporting our caucus with digital communications. We sure appreciate her dedication, her hard work and her smile every morning. Could the House please thank Leah Caldow for her contributions.

Chandra Herbert: Of course, we all have constituents who are incredibly persuasive, who are loud, who can get us to do things at all hours of the day and night. I want to welcome — well, celebrate — the birth of a new constituent of my colleague from the north coast, Lua Alan Rice. Of course, my colleague and her partner, Andrea Wilmot, were able to bring Lua into the world on December 7 — seven pounds. More babies around this place.

I think we certainly celebrate a new birth in this House and to this family here in the Legislature. One hundred and seventy-six souls were lost.

On board were people of many different nationalities: 63 Canadians, 82 Iranians, 11 from Ukraine, ten from Sweden, seven from Afghanistan, three from the United Kingdom. Among them, nine crew members just trying to do their jobs the best they could. Of the passengers on board, were on their way to Canada. When I heard this, I knew I would awaken to a community in mourning. Ayeshe Pourghaderi and Fatemah Pasavand, the wife and daughter of Amir Bakery, a family business on Lonsdale between 19th and 20th streets.

Daniel Saket, who was an engineer, and his wife, who was a hygienist, Faye Kazerani, were also on the plane, and Delaram Dadashnejad, a student at Langara. Those were just the people who lived in my community on the North Shore.

There were so many more lives lost who had ties throughout the Lower Mainland and the rest of Canada — so much potential gone, so many loved ones never to return. Canada has demanded accountability and a thorough investigation. The North Shore News called it the day that we all learned to say. Out of the ashes of this painful wreckage rose a community more resilient than ever before — Iranian Canadians, along with their non-Iranian neighbours throughout the country, brought together by tragedy to lift each other up, to remember those lost and to find a way forward as one people.

My own riding of Richmond North Centre is home to a vibrant community of restaurants and local businesses. People are afraid to go into crowds. Restaurants are closing their doors due to the drop in sales, and many of the local businesses that rely on close ties with China are suffering greatly, as imports and exports have virtually come to a stop, in terms of exports of our seafood and wine to China and our imports of Chinese products here.

I rise today to remind everyone that the coronavirus is a common enemy, one we must fight and overcome together. We must also fight hard against the spread of fearmongering and stigmatization. Negative stereotypes towards any group have no place in British Columbia or in Canada.

It is in times like this, more than ever, that we as Canadians have a responsibility to protect our multicultural communities and support our local businesses. Practise basic health habits. Avoid the spreading of false information. As with other seasonal viruses and cases of flu, common sense and good health habits are the best defences.

Make sure to wash your hands frequently to prevent the spread of germs. We have some of the best health care workers in the world all across the province, and we cannot thank them enough for what they do for us every day, especially when we are faced with health concerns like this.

Braille is a tactile reading and writing system of raised dots that are read by touch. Each dot or combination of dots represents a letter of the alphabet, a number or a punctuation mark.

They can be used to express words, sentences, equations, musical notes and more. About 1. Braille is a vital communication tool for many blind and visually impaired people. Our government believes that everyone deserves to have the same opportunities and access to literacy. Braille breaks down barriers to communication and information and is a powerful tool for education and accessibility.

Louis Braille adapted the system in the early 19th century from a military code soldiers used to read messages in the dark. Today Braille is one of the important technological solutions that enable people with visual impairments to read, write and communicate. Our government is taking steps to improve accessibility and inclusion for all people of all abilities, including those with vision loss.

We recently released the results of public consultations on accessibility and inclusion. These results clearly show that there is strong support for developing legislation to identify, remove and prevent barriers that impede the full participation of people with disabilities. I encourage everyone to learn more about Braille and celebrate it as a major accomplishment in the way that people with vision loss can communicate.

I also encourage members to consider how we can all work together to create accessible, inclusive communities where we all have an opportunity to thrive. Sturdy: Last August a criminal act of vandalism caused the Sea to Sky Gondola, an asset which has fundamentally changed the tourism economy in Squamish, to come crashing to the ground. Some of you may have enjoyed the views of Howe Sound and Garibaldi or the suspension bridge or the network of accessible trails in this now iconic installation.

However, on August 10 last year, in the middle of a record-breaking operating season, the main haul rope for the gondola was deliberately and completely severed. Most of the 30 gondola cabins attached to the cable crashed down the mountain.

Only through good fortune and the fact that this malicious act took place in the dark of night is it that no person was hurt, although hundreds of people suffered unexpected job loss. Within a few short weeks of the sabotage, the Squamish Chamber of Commerce and Tourism Squamish came together to host a job fair. The lift manufacturers from Switzerland and Austria committed to getting this important economic driver and tourism amenity back up and running with all speed.

Ahead of schedule, a new cable and 30 new cabins have been installed and tested by Technical Safety British Columbia, and as one would expect, a brand-new, state-of-the-art, high-tech security system has also, unfortunately, had to be installed. While I look forward to the opportunity to ride this gondola again on Friday, I also look forward to the outcome of the criminal investigation and witnessing the individuals or organization responsible being held accountable and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Glumac: An act of kindness is a gift that each of us can give. It can not only make a difference to someone who needs it, but it can ripple much further than we can see. Our children face complex issues, from cyberbullying to mental health concerns to questions about gender and sexual identity. So this week and every week think about what you can do to share some kindness.

In fact, today we have our first question period of the session. To my colleagues on the other side of the floor: we receive so many complaints about how we treat each other in the House. Maybe today for the first question of question period we can start off saying something nice. There are many ways we can spread kindness. There are many others. This week is a great opportunity to talk about that with your kids and for the kids to talk about that with their parents — to talk about the impact that a simple act of kindness can have on someone who needs it.

One of their most impactful events is the annual Richmond Christmas fund, a program first started in the s that is still going strong, supported by nearly volunteers who contribute well over 3, hours annually to give back to the community. Thanks to this generosity, Richmond Cares, Richmond Gives was able to provide holiday help to the roughly 2, parents, children, seniors and teenagers who needed help. This included toys, books and sports equipment, all collected through donation drives and fundraising events.

There are countless personal stories of charity, its impacts and the joy that community-building events such as these can have.

Wilkinson: Yesterday we saw this facility, the legislative precinct, effectively blockaded and obstructed for about six hours. Then, of course, today we have the Granville Street bridge blocked in both directions on the main route between VGH and St. Horgan: I thank the Leader of the Opposition for his question. I give full credit to the staff, as the Leader of the Opposition did, in keeping our legislative precinct operating. We delivered a throne speech that had a whole host of issues that give hope to British Columbians in every corner of this province with respect to their car insurance, with respect to continuing education for their youth, and a whole host of other issues that we will be able to talk about in the throne speech debate and beyond.

With respect to the disruptions that the civil disobedience is leading to, I agree with the former minister. I want to acknowledge to all members of the House and to all British Columbians that civil unrest is an appropriate part of our discourse in British Columbia and in Canada, but interfering in the livelihoods and the well-being of other people, putting other people at risk, is not acceptable.

Every member of this House agrees with that statement, and we need to ensure that law enforcement has the tools they need. Speaker: The Leader of the Official Opposition on a supplemental. British Columbians have limits on the right of protest. Closing the Cambie and Broadway intersection for 14 hours on the busiest ambulance route in western Canada means that people with chest pain on their way to get life-saving procedures go on a detour with a motorcycle escort because somebody decided to light a fire in the middle of the intersection.

Horgan: I appreciate that those on the other side of the House have multiple leaders in Ottawa. Certainly, Mr. Singh is entitled to his opinions, as are all British Columbians and, indeed, all Canadians. I will agree with the member…. I know this will be disorienting for him. This is a challenge for all of us — government, opposition, regular citizens. But we do not want to live in a society where politicians direct law enforcement to do issues that are outside the bounds of their abilities within the confines of our judicial system.

Seek an injunction. Speaker: The Leader of the Official Opposition on a second supplemental. Will the Premier stand here today and disavow the remarks from his Minister of Forests and his parliamentary secretary and stand by the rule of law?

Horgan: Again, I appreciate that out-of-context comments are the stock and trade of opposition parties. This is an extremely serious issue, and all of us understand that. All of us, unanimously, supported the declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples just last fall, and those words need to mean something beyond just being on a piece of paper. That means honest, genuine dialogue with the different views in our province.

Leadership is not about directing people to get out of the way if we disagree with them. Leadership is about bringing people together to find a way forward. No Hereditary Chiefs have said yes to pipelines in their territories.

Will the minister stand in this House and admit he was wrong and reject his past comments? Will the minister admit his actions inflamed the situation and ultimately encouraged unlawful behaviour?

Horgan: All of us here have dual roles. Those on this side of the House, a portion of us in government, are part of executive council. Every member of this House is accountable and responsible to their constituents. The member for Stikine was visiting his constituents, and they were conducting a lawful activity.

When that stopped, he stopped meeting with them. Members, to bring up acting on behalf of your constituents as part and parcel of what has been not a recent phenomenon but a year-old challenge about addressing the injustice to Indigenous peoples right across the province.

Speaker: The member for Queensborough on a supplemental. The problem with the NDP is they want to have it both ways. In opposition, they routinely participated in protests against the Coastal GasLink Pipeline and vowed to stop the project.

This week the friend and predecessor of the Minister of Advanced Education chimed in. Will the minister admit today these statements are wrong and that they encourage unlawful protests? We did that conscious that not every British Columbian agreed with us. We did that knowing that there was a divide in communities….

Speaker: Members. Horgan: …not just in the north but in the south as well. This is a teachable moment. This is a teachable moment for people on that side of the House. Horgan: Life is not black and white. Life is complex, and you have to work with people to get positive outcomes. Olsen: We, indeed, have seen escalating protests across the province and across the country. At its core, though…. What has not been said in the previous questions is that these protests represent the long-standing failure of Canadian governments to properly adhere to a Supreme Court decision that established the need to address and reconcile Aboriginal rights and title with the Crown sovereignty.

Government has been well aware of the existing, long-standing and unresolved matters relating to rights and title in the area. My question is to the Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation.

Fraser: I want to thank the Leader of the Third Party for his question. This project represents a significant opportunity for all people in British Columbia. Three thousand people so far have been hired on the project. Local and Indigenous businesses are benefiting from this project. Substantial efforts also have been made to consult and accommodate concerns that have been raised. That is the Hereditary Chiefs. Our discussions are proceeding in a respectful way, with a recognition that this work together is both complex and will take time.

This work is continuing. Speaker: The Leader of the Third Party on a supplemental. One of my hardest days was being escorted into this place by police to get past protesters screaming that reconciliation is dead. When this House passed DRIPA unanimously, we all took responsibility for recognizing Indigenous laws within the Canadian legal system, while also expressly recognizing that leadership other than established by the federal Indian Act exists.

I will never accept that reconciliation is dead. In fact, now is when we must lean in. However, it is more important than ever that this government, through their words and, more importantly, their actions, shows a pathway forward.

My question, again, is to the Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. What are the immediate steps he is taking to initiate a more positive dialogue and set in motion the action plans required to truly engage in the work that this government committed to in advancing reconciliation?

Fraser: Thanks to the Leader of the Third Party for the question. I want to thank him for that. While the events of the past week underscore, I think, the challenges that we all face in reconciliation, they in no way shake our resolve as government — or, I would hope, for all of us in this place — to advance reconciliation. We made history by recognizing the human rights of Indigenous people in law in this place just a few months ago.

The process of aligning B. The next step is developing an action plan, in collaboration with Indigenous peoples, which will set out the priorities and the timeline and the accountabilities.

We have begun discussions with Indigenous partners on how best to involve Indigenous peoples in the development of the action plan. In addition, all ministers are continuing their ongoing work to look at their legislation within their ministries and to bring them into alignment with the UN declaration. Reconciliation is a top priority for this government, regardless of the events of this last week.

Delivering affordable housing on reserve — never done before. And, of course, ensuring that children are cared for in Indigenous communities, where that care belongs. All of that work forms the basis for us as a government and changes the Crown-Indigenous relationship in a way that will make it better for all people in British Columbia. Ross: Good grief. You talk about going to talk to Hereditary Chiefs, going to talk about the issues.

On that same day, when you went to talk to Hereditary Chiefs, did you go visit the band councils too? Did you think about all the issues First Nations are facing — the suicide, the unemployment?

Did anybody talk about that? I hear these words — accountability, honest and genuine dialogue. Nobody has any business going into these First Nations communities and furthering the divide in any of the communities.

You should be ashamed of yourselves. Powell River…. These are real issues, and for the first time in our history, we have the opportunity to fix these issues. But no. What do we see? We see 1 percent of a minority being addressed in this House. Nobody is talking about the 99 percent of the people that are being put into jobs, education, training and fixing their own lives.

Which case law principle are you talking about — Haida, Delgamuukw, Mikisew Cree? Which one? My question is to the Minister of Indigenous Relations. Is he still working for you guys? Fraser: I thank the member for the question. I was honoured to attend an event, a smoke feast, which the Premier, the member for Stikine and myself attended. It was an inclusive process where elected were present along with the Hereditary Chiefs.

Since that time, we have initiated a reconciliation process. Our work with them is, in part, to help bring the communities together in ways…. At that time, we brought on — and he is still working with us — Murray Rankin, a respected constitutional lawyer, a former MP. In the more recent process of trying to de-escalate the standoff and the police action that ended up following, we did bring in Nathan Cullen — again, a former MP, a respected person — to help coordinate.

That work will continue. Ross: The question is: is Nathan Cullen still working for you guys? That was the question. This was a specific exercise undertaken by this government. You hired a guy that already has a bias against LNG and already has an opinion on what rights and title should look like. The only people that should determine that are the courts of B. The question remains: is Nathan Cullen still working for you guys? Horgan: I appreciate the view of the member for Skeena. We want to make sure that First Peoples and everyone are in a position to benefit from the splendour of this province.

You can shake your head all you want, Member. You can shake your head all you want. You just want disruption. Members, order, please. I was also privy to an online message from someone who was literally trapped in their office building downtown, trying to go out through the stairwell, gets to the bottom and guess what.

Very serious. Will they be allowed to shut down these ministry offices? Horgan: As I said in questions from the Leader of the Opposition, all of us and all British Columbians want those who have a different point of view to have the opportunity to express that point of view but not at the expense of the liberty of other people. Again, I ask the member. Would she like to live in a society where the Leader of the Opposition could direct police to do whatever he felt was best for him? Of course not.

These legislative changes are further evolving the ferries model based on the ferry review conducted by Blair Redlin in As BC Ferries recovers from the pandemic, its vital people living in B. The changes will establish a new requirement that asbestos abatement contractors be licensed to operate in British Columbia, and they provide WorkSafeBC with the authority to create a mandatory safety training program for workers and contractors who perform asbestos abatement work.

Until now, B. These changes will go a long way to ensuring the health and safety of asbestos abatement workers now, and in the future. ICBC expects even more online features to be available in the future. May 1 also will mark the last day that B. British Columbian skilled trades professionals will be better supported and recognized under the Skilled Trades BC Act. The renewed focus of SkilledTradesBC reflects the expanded responsibilities associated with Skilled Trades Certification and a new focus on promoting and supporting apprentices and trainees throughout their training journey.

SkilledTradesBC will remain the authority on trades training in BC with enhanced and streamlined services to help apprentices navigate training and get access to support. Legislative changes will further support the Village of Lytton as it moves forward with recovery.

Bill No. The amendments will support the village by:. These additions increase protection for wildlife habitat, ecosystems, culturally significant areas and expand opportunities for recreation. Boundary modifications to correct administrative errors and address safety issues would also be made to two parks and two ecological reserves. Two bills introduced in fall are helping to strengthen Indigenous rights and advance reconciliation in B.

New legislation will establish metre protected zones around hospitals, COVID test and vaccination centres, and K schools to prevent disruptive behaviour from affecting them. Amendments to the Forest Act will give government the tools to better care for our forests, further support reconciliation with Indigenous Nations and encourage a more diverse forestry industry. The approval of early learning and child care legislation will help the Province deliver on its Childcare BC commitment to build the affordable, quality and inclusive early learning and child care system families need.

Amendments to the Election Act will make an annual allowance for political parties permanent. Legislative changes to teacher certification and regulation brought forward have been co-developed with the First Nations Education Steering Committee, acting under the direction of the First Nations engaged in the initiative. Proposed legislative amendments will allow the Province to ban more single-use plastics. Proposed legislative amendments respond to local government requests, give communities new tools to deliver housing, and dissolve the Jumbo Glacier Mountain Resort Municipality.

The new Act provides societies with a responsive legislative framework, giving them greater adaptability in their internal governance, while also ensuring transparency and accountability.

The purpose of the proposed amendments is to address various issues that have come to light since the Act came into force. These proposed amendments will refine the Societies Act by making it more accessible, addressing uncertainties and omissions, and creating consistency within the Act and with other legislation.

Bill 18 adds Indigenous identity as a protected ground under the B. Human Rights Code, further helping to combat racism and protect Indigenous Peoples from discrimination. Through Bill 29, we have also added a non-derogation clause to the Interpretation Act. This clause makes it clear that provincial laws uphold, and do not diminish, the rights of Indigenous Peoples as outlined under section 35 of the Constitution of Canada.

By working in partnership with Indigenous leadership to make these amendments, B. Amendments included in the fall Attorney General Statutes Amendment Act will update legal statutes that impact British Columbians. Amendments to the Judicial Compensation Act will streamline the judicial compensation commission process, leading to a timelier and more efficient process for setting and implementing changes to compensation for the provincial court judges and judicial justices in British Columbia.

The Province is introducing new legislation that will protect critical services such as health care and education, protecting those working in the facilities, as well as those who use them.

Under the legislation, it will be an offence to prevent access to the facility, disrupt services or intimidate health-care workers, patients, students, teachers and other staff. As the pressures on timber supply continue due to the impacts of beetle epidemics, wildfires and climate change, amending the Forest Act will enable government to better manage our forests for all British Columbians.

In addition, the amendments clarify the compensation that government will provide to tenure holders after a change in harvesting rights. Other changes require tenure holders to provide current information on forest inventory to the Chief Forester to support decision making. There will also be increased accountability for log exporters through a new auditing system to make sure they have paid their full fee-in-lieu of domestic manufacturing, ensuring British Columbians are receiving their fair share of resource revenue.

These two Acts are an important step to streamline early learning and child care legislation to meet the diverse needs of B.

The Early Learning and Child Care Act will make child care more affordable by providing the minister responsible with the authority to set limits on fees. The Early Childhood Educators Act will improve oversight of early childhood educators ECEs and programs with a public registry, and it will help the Province recruit and retain ECEs, by giving the Registrar authority to temporarily register internationally trained ECEs.

These Acts are part of the foundation for an inclusive, universal child care system in B. The Province is making amendments to the Election Act to provide a permanent annual allowance to political parties at the recommendation of the Special Committee to Review Provisions of the Election Act. This amount will adjust each following year, based on changes in the Consumer Price Index and the number of votes parties received in the most recent provincial election.

Education can and must play a key role in reconciliation and in creating a future of equity and justice in British Columbia. Legislative changes introduced will support First Nations in the certification and regulation of teachers who work in schools under their jurisdiction, and will enable the Province to provide operational support. These changes will lead to improved outcomes for Indigenous students. Amendments to the Environment Management Act will enable government to identify and take direct action to phase out single-use plastic products and packaging.

The current act allows for packaging materials such as plastic checkout bags and single polystyrene foam takeout containers to be regulated or banned. Following feedback from the public and local governments, the changes will add the ability to regulate other single-use plastic products like drinking straws, utensils and stir sticks. Decisions will be made based on environmental and economic impacts of any bans, with the first phase of new regulations expected in early Changes to the Local Government Act, Community Charter and Vancouver Charter will add a new requirement for all municipal councils and regional district boards to publicly consider whether they wish to develop codes of conduct for their council or board members.

Updates to the Local Government Act, Community Charter, Islands Trust Act, Municipal Replotting Act, University Endowment Land Act and Vancouver Charter will enable local governments to determine and specify, by bylaw, the methods they will use to provide public notice that will reach the greatest number of people in their communities.

The amendments to the Local Government Act will remove the default requirement for local governments to hold public hearings for zoning bylaw amendments that are consistent with their official community plan and enable local governments to delegate decisions on minor development variance permits to staff. Amendments the Islands Trust Act address specific requests made by the Islands Trust board of directors to deal with some administrative barriers.

It is focused on three guiding principles: increased sector participation, enhanced stewardship and sustainability, and a strengthened social contract to give government more control over management of the sector. A key part of this will be replacing Forest Stewardship Plans — which are now developed by the sector — with Forest Landscape Plans which will address ecological and cultural values, as well as timber values of forests.

With these amendments, B. Specifically, the amendments:. Amendments included in the fall Miscellaneous Bill will update legal statutes in a variety of acts that impact British Columbians. Changes to the Adoption Act will support First Nation adoptees in obtaining their status to gain access to federal benefits. Updates to the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act will protect financially vulnerable people from predatory lending practices.

Changes to the Civil Resolution Tribunal Act will improve access to justice. Amendments to the Oil and Gas Activities Act will support the timely restoration of well sites.

An amendment to the Passenger Transportation Act will move the appointment date of a special committee on passenger-directed transportation in consideration of the impacts of COVID on the industry. Updates to the Safety Standards Act will improve safety at amusement and trampoline parks. The Societies Act provides the legislative framework for the creation and governance of British Columbia societies. Societies are not-for-profit corporations, organized for a wide range of purposes from charitable to educational, and environmental to recreational and prohibited from distributing profits to their members.

There are over 29, societies in our province. Societies vary significantly in size, ranging from small volunteer-run associations to large professional-run charities. More than ever, they play a vital role in our communities — from health and housing services, to sports, cultural and other community-based activities, to environmental and social advocacy.

The pandemic has highlighted the important role these community minded organizations play in keeping us connected, providing mental health supports, and supporting those struggling with income or food insecurity.

Learn more. Legislation is being introduced to establish a new hectare Class A park near the Koksilah River in the Cowichan Valley. Used by Cowichan people since time immemorial, the area of the new park includes pockets of old-growth Douglas fir forest, a sensitive grassland ecosystem, rare species of vascular plants, and limestone geological features.

Amendments to the Employment Standards Act will provide workers with three days of paid sick leave related to COVID until December 31, ; and will create a permanent paid sick leave for workers who cannot work due to any personal illness or injury. The Province is introducing amendments to the Electoral Boundaries Commission Act EBCA to provide the upcoming Electoral Boundaries Commission with more independence and flexibility as they work to recommend an electoral map for the next two general elections.

The Accessible B. Act will support the development of new accessibility standards — in areas like employment, the built environment, and customer service — by identifying, removing and preventing barriers. Investments will target small and medium sized businesses with the growth potential and the ability to anchor talent, jobs, intellectual property and innovation in B.

Proposed amendments to the Employment Standards Act to provide paid leave to get a COVID vaccine, ensuring no one has to choose between losing pay or their health. The Public Interest Disclosure Act PIDA is being amended to provide greater clarity for government employees who report serious wrongdoings under the act, and support the expansion of PIDA to the broader public sector.

Once enacted, this legislation will move the province further along the path to achieving a child care system that meets the needs of B. In April , the Province temporarily removed legislative barriers to meeting electronically so organizations facing the challenges of COVID could continue to govern and provide services through the pandemic.

This legislation makes virtual meetings a permanent option for B. Along with the electronic meetings and hearings, the amendments will: expand eligibility for mail ballot voting by bylaw in local government elections; permit improvements districts greater flexibility with the timing of their annual general meetings and trustee terms; and create new Ministerial authorities for borrowing in emergency situations and elections administration matters, allowing the Province to be more responsive in future extraordinary events.

The legislation also ensures extraordinary financial measures and corresponding repayment obligations currently under COVID Ministerial Order , which is set to expire on July 10, , will continue to have legal effect after this date. The amendments to the Motor Vehicle Act will provide an additional debt collection tool that can be used to ensure that COVID rule breakers are held accountable and will give further incentive for those who have received tickets to pay their fines.

To obtain relief from the RTI, a debtor must pay their outstanding fines in full or establish a suitable payment arrangement. Amendments to the Family Law Act will clarify that when determining whether behaviour constitutes family violence, it is irrelevant whether the person responsible for the behaviour intended to harm the family member.

This allows BC Hydro to consider third-party use of the site, which could generate new revenues for BC Hydro, benefiting ratepayers and supporting B. To better support workers during the pandemic, amendments to the Employment Standards Act will bring in three days of paid COVID sick leave for people who are sick with COVID or are waiting for a test result and need to self isolate.

The legislation will also create a permanent paid sick leave for workers who cannot work due to any illness or injury beginning January 1, The number of paid sick days and other supports will be determined following consultations with the business community, labour organizations, Indigenous partners, and other stakeholders.

The Province is introducing amendments to the EBCA to better support the Electoral Boundaries Commission in their work to recommend electoral districts for the next two general elections. The amendments will also specify that the commission may take into account special considerations respecting demographic and geographic factors, including keeping a manageable geographic size for electoral districts, in order to ensure effective representation.

The Accessible British Columbia Act marks the next step in building an inclusive province that works for all of us. It will support the development of accessibility standards to ensure that all British Columbians can fully and equally participate in their communities. This includes, but is not limited to, employment, the delivery of services, transportation, the built environment, information and communications, education, procurement and health. Developed in consultation with the business and investment sectors, InBC will focus on driving innovation, sustainability and inclusiveness in our economy.

InBC will also attract investment, create family supporting jobs, and diversify B. InBC will invest in high-growth potential businesses in British Columbia, and leverage investments from the private and public sectors to help businesses grow.

InBC will have a triple bottom line investment mandate, aiming to: Establish B. If passed, the amendments to the Employment Standards Act will provide British Columbian part-time or full-time workers with up to three hours of paid leave to get their COVID vaccine, for each dose.

This leave supports B. Many vulnerable and low-wage workers — who are often women or migrant workers — lack benefits, so the ability to take employer-paid leave to receive the vaccine will be especially beneficial to them. Government is making it as easy as possible for people to get their COVID vaccine through simple registration, long clinic hours throughout the province and through different leave options to encourage workers to get their vaccine when it is their time.

If passed, the effective date will be retroactive to the date of introduction April 19, The Province is amending PIDA to ensure consistent interpretation of critical definitions and provisions, and by clarifying statutory roles. In addition, the time to start the prosecution of an offence under PIDA, such as for a reprisal against a whistleblower, is being extended from six months to two years. This makes the reprisal protections in PIDA more meaningful by recognizing that identifying and investigating a reprisal may often take longer than six months.

These updates will explicitly outline the definition of each term and provide greater clarity around where they apply. Government has introduced amendments to the Court of Appeal Act that, if passed, will make the process of filing an appeal easier to understand and more efficient for lawyers and people who are self-represented.

The Interim Supply Bill allows government to continue to fund important programs ahead of tabling Budget The Firearm Violence Prevention Act will address public safety concerns of the growing inventory of illegal guns and gang members buying, transporting and possessing real and imitation firearms. Amendments to the Local Government Campaign Financing Act will strengthen local elections campaign financing rules, and increase accountability and transparency in local elections to ensure people — and not big money — are at the centre of community politics throughout British Columbia.

Proposed amendments to the Real Estate Services Act and financial institutions legislation will transfer responsibility for the regulation of the real estate market to the BC Financial Services Authority and help create a single modern and efficient regulator of the financial services sector, including real estate, in B. The centralization of the Home Owner Grant program will give B. Proposed legislative changes will strengthen tenancy laws in B.

Proposed changes to the Mental Health Act will improve the care and safety of youth under the age of 19 who are experiencing severe problematic substance use by providing short-term voluntary emergency stabilization care following and overdose.

Proposed changes to the Mines Act in B. New legislation helps confirm supports for people and businesses and responds to the fiscal impacts of COVID by allowing government to run deficit budgets. Government is proposing amendments to the Motor Vehicle Act No. Changes to the Wills, Estates and Succession Act will make it easier for British Columbians to make a will, especially during the pandemic. The amendments to the Strata Property Act and Financial Institutions Act will help stratas better mitigate the rising costs of insurance by bringing more transparency to the strata insurance industry and give strata owners and corporations the tools they need to do their part.

 
 

Unity day vancouver canada 2020 taxact professionalism

 
 
The Liberals need a real plan that supports workers and creates jobs in communities across Canada. They need to stop giving billions in subsidies to oil and gas. Mr. Speaker, I am presenting a petition on behalf of Canadians who want a permanent end to the ArriveCAN app, the vaccine mandates and all COVID mandates.

You Might Also Like

No Comments

Leave a Reply